Where is the outrage? They could have at least given her some sweet and sour sauce, those bastards!!!
From TVNZ: An Australian man who pimped a 16-year-old schoolgirl paid her with chicken nuggets for having sex with men, a court has been told.Ronald Vikash Gander, 27, and his 16-year-old girlfriend devised a plan to prostitute a teenage girl so they could afford the weekly $1,050 rent on a serviced inner-Brisbane apartment, the Brisbane District Court was told.
The court was told the girl made $4,500 for having sex with five middle-aged men in June last year.
Gander and his girlfriend used the money for living expenses and paid the girl nothing except for the occasional box of chicken nuggets. The court was told Gander's girlfriend - who cannot be named - threatened the student, who had run away from home, with eviction if she didn't continue having sex with clients to earn her keep. Judge Marshall Irwin described the prostitution offences as "sordid". "The girl was used as if she was a piece of meat ... and your conduct can properly be described as that of a sleaze merchant," Judge Irwin said.
-----------------
I do not think Gander and his girlfriend were behaving any differently than many CEO's. The 16 year old hooker does the dirty work and her "bosses" feel entitled to take most of the money. (How many CEO's do you reckon are Christians? )
This is the typical selfishness one expects to see these days, due in large part to liberals who think it's OK to treat others like crap as long as they get what THEY want. It is just a symptom of a much larger problem. The elitist Obama administration thinks it's perfectly fine to give their elitist CEO friends trillions of taxpayer dollars while only paying lip service to those truly in need.
These bailouts must be a real kick in the balls to all those puppy-eyed Obama supporters who were hoping to get Government money or have their student loans forgiven or mortgages forgiven, etc. (We conservatives feel your pain as many of us were expecting much more from "W", but were highly disappointed.)
If more people would get to church, you'd be reading a lot less about stories such as the one above.
Posts
yah like the church is full of saints. let's see - responsible for the deaths of 50 million people in the last 800 years - check! responsible for raping alter boys - check! responsible for infiltrating the government trying to force their family values on people who don't need any of your help, thank you - check! every wack job that stalks, kills, murders, rapes then starts spouts off religious rhetoric like "God told me to do it!" - check!
ReplyDeleteyah you and your church are wayyyyyy better than everybody else.
it's funny how you believe in something that is just plagerism, stories stolen from religions that preceded it. you know how many religions have a savior, who performed miracles, born from a virgin, died for the sins of the people than rose a few days later, or made up of a combination of those circumstances? at least 100 that came Before christianity. and those were all based on the star positions and the sun. Son of God. Sun of God. 3 kings following a star - 3 stars that align with the north star on december the 25th that point towards where the sun raises. your religion is a farcical story at best and the bible is just a book of morals.
and if you think that more people going to church would change anything, you truly are misguided. for everyone to truly be happy, we must get rid of money, and focus less on a 2000 year old story, and start focusing more on technology and how it can better our lives. they are right now creating nano technology, which are basically little robots that float around in our bodies killing off cancer cells and other diseases as they form, like super white blood cells. they can effectively end disease. if you were to say which do i believe would save me if i had cancer, believing in a story or believing in something that actually exists and proven to work, i'm gonna go with option B on that one.
and if we get rid of money, and committed to technology, where machines and robots did all the farm work, transported everything to places that sorts them out automatically, everything is automated, thus freeing us up from working, we wouldn't need to pay taxes, or even need money. everything will be made for us, provided for us, all from automated systems akin to a car assembly line, but for everything rather than just cars. we would be free. crime would be nonexistent - because what really fuels crime? money, or lack thereof. less crime, no world hunger, no rich and powerful elite controlling everything. if we phase out religion as well then there will be little or no war, because war is either all about money or all about religion. tell me one war that didn't have one of those reasons behind it.
and obama/mccain, either or, it wouldn't of mattered who won, and if you believe otherwise, if you believe there are actually 2 different political parties, and you actually think that those political parties want different or opposite things, then you are fooling yourself. there hasn't been a president that hasn't been controlled by the Bilderberg group since JFK. everyone saw that he was shot and fell right back into line. ever wonder why he got shot? because of executive order 11110, which would of ended the Federal Reserve, the very non-federal bank that lends us our money with interest, so we are continually spiraling into debt and have to offset it with taxes, making us wage slaves.
ReplyDeleteyour last sentence should read:
If more people, or better yet, All people, would give up religion, give up money, and end the federal reserve, so we live freely in a moneyless society where everything is provided for us, then we would have a lot less stories such as the one above. because only then will that statement be true.