Ah, the wonders of diversity.....

 

Where are the parents?

 

 

============================================================ Sickening. If anyone can locate a similar video of white kids, send me the link and I'll post it for a bit of balance, otherwise, things are what they are.

 

For additional consideration:

 

 Genesis 11:1-9
1 Now the whole world had one language and a common speech. 2 As men moved eastward, [a] they found a plain in Shinar [b] and settled there.

3 They said to each other, "Come, let's make bricks and bake them thoroughly." They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar. 4 Then they said, "Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of the whole earth."

 

5 But the LORD came down to see the city and the tower that the men were building. 6 The LORD said, "If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. 7 Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other." 8 So the LORD scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city. 9 That is why it was called Babel [c] —because there the LORD confused the language of the whole world. From there the LORD scattered them over the face of the whole earth.
=============================================

It's amazing how people can read the Bible for two thousand years and not see the forrest for the trees. In that passage God uses diversity as a punishment of mankind. White Christian English settlers landed in Jamestown in 1607 and less than 400 years later developed the technology and infrastructure to put a man on the moon. White Christian men did that...

 

Also, the book of Revelation is nothing more than a summary of the end of diversity and a unification of a homogenous Christian population. 

 

Now we return to..."as the pot stirs."

 

===============================

 

Thanks to Mark Webster for providing a link to this video of young white dancers:

 

=======================================

 

 

 

I find this second video disturbing as well, but there is a difference between the two. The parents of the second video are apparently misguided liberal morons while the parents of the first video clearly show that they have reduced mental faculties....as do their kids.

Obama end game predicted 25 years ago.

 

 

Conservatives will definately want to watch this:

 

=====================================

 

 

==============================================================

Forgotten History: Lost U.S. Nukes

 

Although some of you may recall the occasional news story about a nuclear mishap (known as a "Broken Arrow"), most folks do not realize that the United States has lost 60 nuclear bombs since the first accident, which occurred on February 13, 1950 and involed a "Fat Man" type device carried by the mighty, but tempermental, Convair B-36.

 

The good news is that all but 11 of the lost nukes have been recovered. Um, yeah, you read that correctly. Eleven nukes have not been recovered. Sometimes the locations were known, but the bombs were simply left where they were. (The Russians lost some too, but I'll save that for a possible future post)

 

The one incident I wish to focus on is the Tybee Island incident of 1958:

 

From sciscoop: 

 

"It was Feb. 5, 1958, and Richardson was a major at the controls of a B-47 bomber, one of a dozen from the 19th Bombardment Wing taking off on a training mission from Homestead Air Force Base in Florida.

At the time, crews in training routinely carried transportation-configured nuclear bombs, with the detonation capsules removed to prevent a nuclear explosion, the Air Force said. It gave the crews the opportunity to practice, said Billy Mullins, associate director of the Air Force Nuclear Weapons and Counterproliferation Agency.

The mission was to simulate dropping a bomb on a city in the Soviet Union and to evade Air Force fighters sent up to simulate Russian interceptors.

Over Reston, Va., which unknowingly was playing the role of the Soviet city, Richardson’s navigator lined up the target on the radar screen and punched the launch button. The button activated a transmitter that recorded how close the crew came to hitting the target.

Richardson then turned south toward home through a screen of “enemy” fighters. When he and his two-man crew crossed into North Carolina at more than 37,000 feet, they were back in friendly skies.

But that’s when the B-47 collided in midair with one of the “enemy” fighters.

Struggling to keep the bomber under control, Richardson headed for Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah. But the tower operator told the crew the runway was under construction.

“I thought that if we landed short, the plane would catch the front of the runway and the bomb would shoot through the plane like a bullet through a gun barrel,” Richardson said.

So, on that clear, moonlit night, Richardson turned the B-47 toward sea and dropped the bomb in the ocean before landing.

Navy divers searched the waters near Tybee Island for nearly 10 weeks. The weather was bad, the water cold, the visibility poor. On April 16, 1958, the military declared the bomb “irretrievably lost.” No. 47782 became one of 11 “Broken Arrows,” nuclear bombs lost during air or sea mishaps, according to U.S. military records."

 

The interesting thing about this is that the Plutonium detonation capsules were supposed to have been removed from the H-Bombs.  However, according to a 1966 letter written to the chairman of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, four COMPLETE H-Bombs were lost, including the one off Savannah, Georgia. Oops.

 

The military eventually gave up the search and concluded the bomb posed no immediate danger to the surrounding area, unless removal was attempted and the conventional explosives detonated, possibly contaminating the Savannah aquafer with uranium radiation.

 

Your tax dollars at work.

 

 

BP: Scum of the Earth? You make the call.

 

 

Jeez, and I thought Home Depot was bad.  Well, it's no secret that news organizations have been prevented from filming certain areas of the Gulf and Gulf coast. This has been done with the cooperation of the Coast Guard and the federal government. (Who really needs the first amendment?)

 

It has also been reported that over 1500 oil spill workers have gotten ill. BP is spending millions of dollars on national TV advertising explaining how they are in it for the long haul and will clean up the Gulf no matter how long it takes and they will compensate the fishermen for lost income. Well, Drudge is reporting that folks aren't getting their checks as promised and now we have this from the supposedly stand-up, responsible and caring BP:

 

News is breaking from the Gulf of Mexico that cleanup workers — who are really just contracted fishermen — are being told they will be fired if they wear protective gear. BP is not providing the gear, but if workers wear respirators they secure for themselves, the company says they will be fired, according to Louisiana Environmental Action Network and a local environmentalist who just returned from the Gulf.

 

Reports of illness among the workers began almost as soon as the cleanup did. But the government-run health clinics where they are being treated are among areas the federal government has deemed off limits to reporters. The feds also barred press from oiled wildlife and booms in a move that makes them look an awful lot like the PR crew for the British oil giant.

 

A coalition including commercial fishermen's groups, environmental groups and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is petitioning the government to force BP to provide respirators for workers. In its first three hours, the petition has garnered more than 16,000 signatures.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/green/detail?&entry_id=67426#ixzz0tDQ5zjOc

Your Tax Dollars at Work

 

 

Here is an interesting video. The comments that are the basis for this post start around the 1:46 minute mark.

 

 

======================================================

======================================================

 

Aunt: "I really need to get in there and see if my purse burnt up 'cause I had my food stamp card and everything in there"

 

and prior to that statement the Aunt indicated she had no regrets about leaving the children home alone.

 

 

There's nothing wrong with being compassionate, but this case illustrates one of the great failures of liberalism. As the Bible states in Matthew 7:6 “Do not give dogs what is holy, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, lest they trample them underfoot and turn to attack you."

 

There are simply some people who are not worthy of help. The Aunt in the above video is a perfect example. The assistance we give to illegal aliens and people like her is destroying our nation.

 

A new genetic study (but, I thought the only difference between the races was skin color?) shows that whites have a lower instance of a gene that is linked to violence and aggression.

 

Excerpt:

 

New scientific techniques have brought to light exactly how the so-called “warrior gene” named MAOA-L works. New studies using MRI show how brain activity in those who have the MAOA-L gene differs from those without it.

Studies have linked the gene to increased levels of sexual violence, alcoholism, crime, and even higher levels of credit card debt. However, very little is said about it outside of scientific journals. The reason is obvious. Many articles published on the gene even state that it has serious implications concerning race and ethnicity.

Whites, usually referred to in euphemisms like “westerners,” are said to be less likely to have the gene than other groups. One third of whites have MAOA-L, while groups usually only identified as “others” have instances of two thirds or higher. It has also been suggested in scientific journals that whites may be less affected by the gene than “others.”

In fact, researchers have even censored their own findings on race and MAOA-L! Others have faced hostility from the University community for mentioning which races have the highest rates. Source.

 

The general perception is that there are a greater percentage of black and illegal alien prisoners than whites, based on a percentage of their total populations, due to the racism of whites. Certainly some whites are racists in the traditional meaning of the word, but the scientific and genetic data is clear.

 

My point is that all of the affirmative action and public assistance in the world is just not going to help certain groups of people to advance in any material way. We are way past time to discontinue certain types of financial aid, set asides, affirmative action efforts such as dumbing down tests and entrance exams since some people will fail regardless of how much assistance we give them.

 

Illegal aliens need to be rounded up and sent back across the border or otherwise disposed of and the black/white/asian human trash does not need any more money spent on them. We help those who can be helped and do not help those who are beyond help.

 

Our desire for universal compassion is destroying our nation. It MUST stop. NOW.

Why Johnson & Johnson doesn't belong in your portfolio.

 

This post is kind of a reply to Tony Wang's post of May 16th regarding the value of keeping some Johnson & Johnson stock in your portfolio.

 

Below is an excerpt of a CNNMoney.com article which details some of the conditions at Johnson & Johnson's Tylenol plant located in Fort Washington, PA.: (My bold)

 

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The quality and safety violations that led to the shutdown of a Tylenol plant were extremely serious, and could lead to tough action by regulators on drugmaker Johnson & Johnson.

 

"It's absolutely shocking," said David Lebo, a professor of pharmaceutical manufacturing at Temple University in Philadelphia, referring to the Food and Drug Administration's May 6 inspection report on the facility in Fort Washington, Penn., operated by Johnson & Johnson's McNeil division.

 

"This inspection report is pretty close to being the worst I've seen. It suggests that basically the FDA found an issue with almost every system at the plant," said Lebo, who had previously worked for Johnson & Johnson's pharmaceutical sourcing group in 2002. Lebo said he left that job after nine months because the work required too much travel.

 

On May 1, McNeil recalled some 50 children's versions of non-prescription drugs, including Tylenol, Motrin and Benadryl. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, Fortune 500) has suspended production at the plant.

 

The FDA report listed 20 violations, which include 46 consumer complaints on the recalled products. Johnson & Johnson has not revealed details of those complaints. ..........

 

The most damning, according to Lebo, was the charge that the plant "does not maintain adequate laboratory facilities for the testing and approval (or rejection) of components of drug products." (Stop and think about that one for a moment y'all)

 

and

 

The FDA also said that lack of proper controls in the manufacturing process led to some batches of infant's Tylenol being "superpotent," or having too much of some ingredients.

Also, the report noted that employees at the plant were not trained in current good manufacturing practices. The FDA inspectors further detailed dusty and filthy conditions at the plant, including "incubators with a large amount of visible gray and brown dust/debris, large hole in the ceiling and thick dust covering the grill inside a filtered cabinet."

=================================

 

The CEO of Johnson & Johnson can spew all the BS he wants, but the facts are clear. J & J simply cares more about profit than the safety of children. Period.

 

Here you have a company that makes a pain killer for use by infants and the plant that makes it "does not maintain adequate laboratory facilities for the testing and approval of components of drug products." So basically, whatever comes from their vendors is ASSUMED to be what they ordered, is not tested, and is put into a finished product intended for use by INFANTS.

 

Of course, why spend money on plant maintenance or lab equipment that will tell us exactly what we are putting into the products we make, when that cash can be put to better use in the form of executive bonuses.

 

How anyone who has even a remote shred of conscience can recommend owning the stock of a company such as this is beyond me. Although, I guess if your entire life revolves around the acquisition of money to the exclusion of all else then........well.......that's fine. (Not!)

 

Greed first, public safety last. It's the American way.

Home Depot: Greedy corporate scum, squared.

"(Expletive) Michael Powell," the executive said. "Let him sue us."

 

Home Depot knew exactly what it was doing,' U.S. District Judge Daniel Hurley said. 'They simply pushed Mr. Powell away and they did it totally and completely for their own economic benefit.'

By Jane Musgrave

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Updated: 4:35 p.m. Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Posted: 7:40 p.m. Monday, May 10, 2010

 

WEST PALM BEACH — When a Home Depot executive was told inventor Michael Powell might have a claim against the hardware giant for stealing an invention that keeps store employees safe, his reaction was swift and vulgar.

"(Expletive) Michael Powell," the executive said. "Let him sue us."

The crass response typifies the company's attitude toward Powell, who crafted an simple, yet ingenious, way to keep Home Depot employees from slicing off their fingers while they're cutting wood for customers, a federal judge said Monday.

"Home Depot knew exactly what it was doing," U.S. District Judge Daniel Hurley said. "They simply pushed Mr. Powell away and they did it totally and completely for their own economic benefit."

Calling the company callous and arrogant, he ordered it to pay the former Boca Raton man $3 million in punitive damages. That's on top of the $15 million a jury in March said the company should pay him for stealing his so-called "Safe Hands" gadget that is now affixed to radial saws at nearly 2,000 Home Depots nationwide.

The damages for Home Depot don't end there. Hurley also ordered the firm to pay Powell's attorneys the $2.8 million they say they are owed, and to pay Powell an estimated $1 million in interest annually on the judgment. The interest began building in 2006 and will continuing accruing until Home Depot pays up.

The roughly $25 million judgment could have been avoided had the company agreed in 2004 to pay Powell the $2,000 he offered to charge for each device. That bill would have come to $4 million.

Instead, Hurley said, the firm dispatched workers to duplicate the saw guards Powell allowed them to test in eight stores in Georgia and California.

"It's sad to say, but Home Depot literally organized a theft of the Powell invention," he said.

Powell, who now lives in North Carolina, declined to comment on the verdict on the advice of his attorneys . Home Depot attorneys also declined to comment.

A company spokesman said Home Depot disagreed with the ruling and is considering an appeal.

"We have a strong commitment to dealing with our business partners fairly and with integrity, which is how we've maintained long-standing relationships with literally tens of thousands of suppliers over the past 30-plus years," company spokesman Stephen Holmes wrote in an e-mail. "We would never condone actions that intentionally violate another company's intellectual property rights."

However, Hurley said, that's not what the evidence showed during Monday's day-long hearing or during a nearly monthlong trial.

Recognizing it was a Goliath to Powell's David, the company sought to cut him out of any profit for the invention that saved the company millions in worker's compensation claims. In the year before the devices were installed, the company paid out $1 million in claims related to injuries caused by the saw. In the year after the gadgets were installed, it paid out $7,000.

He also criticized Home Depot attorneys for their handling of the case, which he described as "nasty, mean litigation." For instance, when Powell's attorney asked for records of injuries cause by the saws, Home Depot attorneys handed over 6,000 documents. In a spot check of 2,300 pages, Powell's attorneys found one document that dealt with a saw injury.

"This is the kind of activity that people look at that engenders outright disgust for the legal profession," Hurley told Moss. "It is shameful."

==============================

 

Just one more example of America circling the bowl.

The problem with "diversity."

Turn your volume way down before playing the video.

====================================

==================================
And then we have this interesting link:
http://www.jsonline.com/general/37714089.html?bcpid=23739055001&bctid=78489347001
The news story the video is based on (Link) :

A man convicted of murdering University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee film student Nathan Potter was wrestled to the ground, pepper-sprayed and taken under guard from a courtroom Friday after he was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole.

Seandell Jackson spat a string of obscenities at Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Rebecca Dallet as three deputies and Milwaukee police Detective James Hutchinson dragged Jackson to the floor of her courtroom.

Moments before, Jackson's attorney, Patrick Earle, had asked Dallet to weigh into her sentence the 19-year-old Jackson's youth and, as Earle put it, his "lack of impulse control."

As authorities struggled to subdue Jackson, members of his family stood in the back of the courtroom and taunted Potter's family.

"I hate you!" a woman yelled toward the Potters. "I hate you all!"

"God's the judge," another woman yelled toward Potter's mother and father, who held each other and wept.

"God's the judge."

In February, a jury convicted Jackson, 19, of being party to a crime of first-degree intentional homicide and attempted robbery in the shooting death of 21-year-old Potter.

Assistant District Attorney Mark Williams showed Dallet videos of Jackson's reaction when the jury delivered its verdict.

In the videos, Jackson turns to Potter's family, mouths an obscenity and smirks. The video also shows Jackson being led from the courtroom a few minutes after the verdict is announced. As he reaches the courtroom door, he turns toward Potter's family and laughs.

"Is there such a thing as pure evil?" Nathan Potter's father, John Potter, asked Dallet.

"There is the tape."

Jackson shot Potter in the chest in July as Potter walked to his Riverwest apartment in the 2500 block of N. Dousman St.

Jackson and an accomplice, Derek J. Thomas, were attempting to rob Potter. Potter had no money.

Dallet, her voice raspy from the fumes of the pepper spray, also sentenced Jackson to five years in prison for attempted robbery. In addition, she sentenced Jackson to five years in prison for an unrelated non-fatal shooting that occurred the same day that Potter was killed.

No one was seriously injured in the courtroom melee, though Hutchinson, the chief detective in Jackson's case, was hit in the eyes by the pepper spray.

Jackson was sentenced in the morning. Hutchinson was back in Dallet's court for Thomas' sentencing in the afternoon.

So was Sarah Potter, Nathan Potter's 13-year-old sister. She told her mother and father that she had been afraid someone was trying to kill them during the morning fracas.

Gulping back tears, Sarah told Dallet that she and her 11-year-old brother, David - who has autism - cannot understand why anyone would even hurt her older brother, whom she called "a loving and caring man."

"We can't sleep knowing he's gone," she said, sitting at the defense table beside her father.

John Potter said later that David wants him to keep all the lights on in their home all the time.

"He asked me to remove all the windows," John Potter said.

Thomas, 20, pleaded guilty in March to felony murder.

Williams told Dallet that Thomas played a limited role in the murder.

"Mr. Jackson was the shooter," Williams said. "Mr. Thomas was a follower."

While Williams asked Dallet to sentence Thomas to 12 years in prison, Nathan Potter's mother, Denise Potter, said he deserved to the maximum penalty for felony murder, which is 35 years.

" 'Help me!' (were) the last words he ever said," Denise Potter said.

"Derek did nothing," she said. "They ran away."

Dallet followed Williams' recommendation, adding eight years of extended supervision.

==================================

Hmmm.......I wonder if those gang bangers and the murderer Seandell Jackson were products of a liberal or conservative public education system?

( Iknow liberals, I know, it's the gun's fault and not the homeboy with the gun---what was I thinking?)

Why we still need the Second Amendment

 

 

From Huffpo: 

NEW ORLEANS — A former New Orleans police officer told federal authorities he saw a fellow officer shoot and kick unarmed, wounded civilians in a deadly incident on a bridge in Hurricane Katrina's aftermath, marking the first time an officer has provided federal authorities with an eyewitness account of the events.

The former officer, Michael Hunter, pleaded guilty Wednesday to helping cover up the shootings on the Danziger Bridge less than a week after the August 2005 storm.

A court filing Wednesday that describes Hunter's account of the shootings contradicts a police report that said civilians shot at officers before the police opened fire, killing two people and wounding four others.

Seeing no danger to officers, Hunter says he shouted "Cease fire!" after an unidentified sergeant with an assault rifle and other officers opened fire on a group of unarmed civilians who took cover behind a concrete barrier on the bridge.

After they stopped firing, Hunter says he saw several civilians who appeared to be unarmed, injured and subdued.

"(The sergeant) suddenly leaned over the concrete barrier, held out his assault rifle, and, in a sweeping motion, fired repeatedly at the civilians lying wounded on the ground," the filing says. "The civilians were not trying to escape and were not doing anything that could be perceived as a threat."

Moments later, Hunter saw two men later identified as Lance Madison and his 40-year-old mentally disabled brother, Ronald, running away near the bottom of the bridge.

Hunter's statement said an unidentified officer shot Ronald Madison in the back with a shotgun.

"As Ronald Madison lay dying on the pavement, (the sergeant) ran down the bridge toward Ronald and asked an officer if Ronald was 'one of them.' When the officer replied in the affirmative, (the sergeant) began kicking or stomping Ronald Madison repeatedly with his foot," the filing states.............

----------------------------------------------

Let's also remember that guns were confiscated after Katrina. Is it a wonder people do not trust our government or our law enforcement anymore?

On another related note....From uruknet :

On Monday, April 5, Wikileaks.org posted video footage from Iraq, taken from a US military Apache helicopter in July 2007 as soldiers aboard it killed 12 people and wounded two children. The dead included two employees of the Reuters news agency: photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh.

 

The US military confirmed the authenticity of the video.

The footage clearly shows an unprovoked slaughter, and is shocking to watch whilst listening to the casual conversation of the soldiers in the background.

As disturbing as the video is, this type of behavior by US soldiers in Iraq is not uncommon.

Truthout has spoken with several soldiers who shared equally horrific stories of the slaughtering of innocent Iraqis by US occupation forces.

"I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces."

The hearings provided a platform for veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan to share the reality of their occupation experiences with the media in the US.

Washburn testified on a panel that discussed the rules of engagement (ROE) in Iraq, and how lax they were, to the point of being virtually nonexistent.

"During the course of my three tours, the rules of engagement changed a lot," Washburn's testimony continued, "The higher the threat the more viciously we were permitted and expected to respond. Something else we were encouraged to do, almost with a wink and nudge, was to carry 'drop weapons', or by my third tour, 'drop shovels'. We would carry these weapons or shovels with us because if we accidentally shot a civilian, we could just toss the weapon on the body, and make them look like an insurgent."

Hart Viges, a member of the 82nd Airborne Division of the Army who served one year in Iraq, told of taking orders over the radio.

"One time they said to fire on all taxicabs because the enemy was using them for transportation.... One of the snipers replied back, 'Excuse me? Did I hear that right? Fire on all taxicabs?' The lieutenant colonel responded, 'You heard me, trooper,fire on all taxicabs.' After that, the town lit up, with all the units firing on cars. This was my first experience with war, and that kind of set the tone for the rest of the deployment."

Vincent Emanuele, a Marine rifleman who spent a year in the al-Qaim area of Iraq near the Syrian border, told of emptying magazines of bullets into the city without identifying targets, running over corpses with Humvees and stopping to take "trophy" photos of bodies.

"An act that took place quite often in Iraq was taking pot shots at cars that drove by," he said, "This was not an isolated incident, and it took place for most of our eight-month deployment."

Kelly Dougherty - then executive director of Iraq Veterans Against the War - blamed the behavior of soldiers in Iraq on policies of the US government.

"The abuses committed in the occupations, far from being the result of a 'few bad apples' misbehaving, are the result of our government's Middle East policy, which is crafted in the highest spheres of US power," she said.

Michael Leduc, a corporal in the Marines who was part of the US attack on Fallujah in November 2004, said orders he received from his battalion JAG officer before entering the city were as follows: "You see an individual with a white flag and he does anything but approach you slowly and obey commands, assume it's a trick and kill him."

Brian Casler, a corporal in the Marines, spoke of witnessing the prevalent dehumanizing outlook soldiers took toward Iraqis during the invasion of Iraq.

"... on these convoys, I saw Marines defecate into MRE bags or urinate in bottles and throw them at children on the side of the road," he stated.

Scott Ewing, who served in Iraq from 2005-2006, admitted on one panel that units intentionally gave candy to Iraqi children for reasons other than "winning hearts and minds.

"There was also another motive," Ewing said. "If the kids were around our vehicles, the bad guys wouldn't attack. We used the kids as human shields."

 

==================================

 

FULL UNCUT VIDEO

==================================

====================================================================

 

The really disturbing thing is the mentality of our troops. We can argue about the causes, but the results speak for themselves. The complete lack of common sense of our troops in assuming people casually walking around a city in broad daylight carrying alleged RPG's is just mind numbing. (Even in an area known for terrorist activity)

 

If our guys will do this to Iraquis and Afghani civillians, they will certainly do it to us.

Recovery?...and, if you thought Bush was an idiot...

 

 

So, it looks like we may have finally hit bottom and the recovery is starting to pick up speed. Not so fast. As Limbaugh has been mentioning, it appears Obama and the Dims have resigned themselves to a baseline 9 or 10 percent unemployment (we know the actual number is higher) as being the new norm. Let's see how that has been working out:

 

===================================

 

 

=================================================================================== And, if you thought Bush 43 was an idiot, have a listen to Dimocrat Hank Johnson. Why do we continue to elect these people? ===================================================================================